<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>climateanswers.info &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateanswers.info/category/technological-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateanswers.info</link>
	<description>What we can and should do to prevent dangerous climate change and also to make us more secure, richer and happier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>University of Illinois Scientists demonstrate ways to create more effective PV panels</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2010/06/university-of-illinois-scientists-demonstrate-ways-to-create-more-effective-pv-panels/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2010/06/university-of-illinois-scientists-demonstrate-ways-to-create-more-effective-pv-panels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Combs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=3684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2010/06/university-of-illinois-scientists-demonstrate-ways-to-create-more-effective-pv-panels/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/PV1-200x131.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>Even if silicon is actually the industry common semiconductor in most electrical units, which includes the cells that photo voltaic (PV) panels utilise to convert sunshine into energy, it is hardly the most cost-efficient product on the market.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2010/06/university-of-illinois-scientists-demonstrate-ways-to-create-more-effective-pv-panels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question: What do you think about &#8220;alternative&#8221; nuclear technologies&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2010/05/question-what-do-you-think-about-alternative-nuclear-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2010/05/question-what-do-you-think-about-alternative-nuclear-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 12:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers to your questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=3633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2010/05/question-what-do-you-think-about-alternative-nuclear-technologies/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Question-mark-2.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>Have you ever looked at "alternative" nuclear technologies, for example molten salt reactors (or liquid fluorides as today are termed)?

Allessandro De Maida]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2010/05/question-what-do-you-think-about-alternative-nuclear-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Italy must lead energy efficiency and renewable production worldwide</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/italy-must-lead-energy-efficiency-and-renewable-production-worldwide/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/italy-must-lead-energy-efficiency-and-renewable-production-worldwide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francesca Polini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=3294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/italy-must-lead-energy-efficiency-and-renewable-production-worldwide/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Montalto-photovaltaic-plant-200x150.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>As a result of its energy efficiency indicators and the expansion of its renewable programme, Italy has the capacity to lead worldwide production of renewable energy and set standards for an efficient model.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/italy-must-lead-energy-efficiency-and-renewable-production-worldwide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Myths about climate change and renewable energy, and how to debunk them</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/myths-about-climate-change-and-renewable-energy-and-how-to-debunk-them/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/myths-about-climate-change-and-renewable-energy-and-how-to-debunk-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=3263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/myths-about-climate-change-and-renewable-energy-and-how-to-debunk-them/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Myths-200x175.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>There are several myths or misunderstandings that have grown up surrounding climate change and renewable energy.  Both sides of the debate can be at fault. This article tries to debunk some of nonsense that is often cited as fact.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/myths-about-climate-change-and-renewable-energy-and-how-to-debunk-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCS: What the EU needs to do &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/ccs-what-the-eu-needs-to-do-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/ccs-what-the-eu-needs-to-do-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale with Simon Tilford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=3198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/ccs-what-the-eu-needs-to-do-part-1/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/CCS-200x150.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>Coal will be the biggest single source of electricity for decades to come. Yet the EU is doing far too little to encourage the take-up of carbon capture and storage, a technology which could make coal a low-carbon fuel. This failure threatens not only Europe’s leadership of global climate change policy but also its ability to profit from the emergence of a huge global market for equipment and expertise. Stephen Tindale and Simon Tilford argue that more public money is needed for the construction of demonstration projects, while regulation and strong market signals will be required to ensure mass deployment of the technology.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/ccs-what-the-eu-needs-to-do-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCS: What the EU needs to do &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/ccs-what-the-eu-needs-to-do-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/ccs-what-the-eu-needs-to-do-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale with Simon Tilford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=3220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/ccs-what-the-eu-needs-to-do-part-2/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/CCS1-200x150.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>Coal will be the biggest single source of electricity for decades to come. Yet the EU is doing far too little to encourage the take-up of carbon capture and storage, a technology which could make coal a low-carbon fuel. This failure threatens not only Europe’s leadership of global climate change policy but also its ability to profit from the emergence of a huge global market for equipment and expertise. Stephen Tindale and Simon Tilford argue that more public money is needed for the construction of demonstration projects, while regulation and strong market signals will be required to ensure mass deployment of the technology.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2010/03/ccs-what-the-eu-needs-to-do-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geoengineering</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/geoengineering/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/geoengineering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=2796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/geoengineering/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/geoengineering_300-200x200.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>Geoengineering is the term given to proposals to try to control the climate through technologies, some of them new and bizarre, and unlikely to happen or to work if they did, some of them are new ways of applying old approaches and some of them new but likely to work.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/geoengineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How low-carbon are different generating technologies?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/how-low-carbon-are-different-generating-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/how-low-carbon-are-different-generating-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=2598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/how-low-carbon-are-different-generating-technologies/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Wind-energy-200x133.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>No form of electricity generation is entirely free of carbon emissions. So just how carbon free are the main types?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/how-low-carbon-are-different-generating-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK planning statements on energy, November 2009</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/11/uk-planning-statements-on-energy-november-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/11/uk-planning-statements-on-energy-november-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=2394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2009/11/uk-planning-statements-on-energy-november-2009/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Plot-of-land-for-sale1-200x150.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>Yesterday (9 November 2008), the UK Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Ed Miliband, published National Policy Statements (NPS) outlining the government policy on energy. They consist of guidance to the new Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC), which, from next March, is due to grant or refuse planning permission on major energy and transport infrastructure projects. The statements are area a mixed bag - good on renewables, nuclear and electricity networks, but less good on coal.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/11/uk-planning-statements-on-energy-november-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question: Can we build enough nuclear power stations and will the nuclear industry turn them off when they are not needed?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/question-can-we-build-enough-nuclear-power-stations-and-will-the-nuclear-industry-turn-them-off-when-they-are-not-needed/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/question-can-we-build-enough-nuclear-power-stations-and-will-the-nuclear-industry-turn-them-off-when-they-are-not-needed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers to your questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=2227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/question-can-we-build-enough-nuclear-power-stations-and-will-the-nuclear-industry-turn-them-off-when-they-are-not-needed/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Question-mark-2.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>Will it be possible to build all the necessary nuclear power stations in time, what emission savings can be made and will the nuclear industry close them down when and if they are not needed?

Shaun Bernie]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/question-can-we-build-enough-nuclear-power-stations-and-will-the-nuclear-industry-turn-them-off-when-they-are-not-needed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
