<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>climateanswers.info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateanswers.info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateanswers.info</link>
	<description>What we can and should do to prevent dangerous climate change and also to make us more secure, richer and happier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>26 April 2012: Germany planning several new fossil fuel plants</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/25-april-2012-germany-planning-many-new-fossil-fuel-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/25-april-2012-germany-planning-many-new-fossil-fuel-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germany is planning several new coal and gas power stations - without CCS - to replace its nuclear stations. This is bad for the climate and also a waste of money.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/25-april-2012-germany-planning-many-new-fossil-fuel-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>13 April 2012: Energy efficiency &#8211; made in Denmark and exportable to the rest of the EU?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/13-april-2012-energy-efficiency-made-in-denmark-exportable-to-the-rest-of-the-eu/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/13-april-2012-energy-efficiency-made-in-denmark-exportable-to-the-rest-of-the-eu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Denmark, the current president of the European Council of Ministers, should stand firmly behind the Commission's proposals on energy efficiency and not give in to the demands of other member states.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/13-april-2012-energy-efficiency-made-in-denmark-exportable-to-the-rest-of-the-eu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9 April 2012: The EU Budget</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/9-april-2012-the-eu-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/9-april-2012-the-eu-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Centre for European Reform has now published a short paper by John Peet, who is Europe editor of the Economist, and me on the EU Budget.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/9-april-2012-the-eu-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 April 2012: UK struggling with low-carbon bridge technologies</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/2-april-2012-uk-struggling-with-low-carbon-bridge-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/2-april-2012-uk-struggling-with-low-carbon-bridge-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK is running another competition on CCS. But practical progress so far has been precisely zero. And Eon and RWE have pulled out of their UK nuclear joint venture. So there's a real risk that the UK will experience another 'dash for gas' without CCS.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/2-april-2012-uk-struggling-with-low-carbon-bridge-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 March 2012: A response to four former Friends of the Earth directors on nuclear power</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/03/15-march-2012-response-to-4-former-friends-of-the-earth-directors-on-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/03/15-march-2012-response-to-4-former-friends-of-the-earth-directors-on-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four former heads of Friends of the Earth wrote to prime minister, David Cameron, earlier this week, arguing against nuclear power. In response, five environmental authors - including me - have written to Cameron arguing in favour of new nuclear.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/03/15-march-2012-response-to-4-former-friends-of-the-earth-directors-on-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>23 February 2012: Obama tries again to cut fossil fuel subsidies</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/02/comment-23-february-2012-obama-tries-again-to-cut-fossil-fuel-subsidies/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/02/comment-23-february-2012-obama-tries-again-to-cut-fossil-fuel-subsidies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['cap-and-trade']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama has again asked the US Congress to agree a budget which cuts the more than $40 billion in tax breaks for oil, gas and coal producers over the next decade. The president’s budget proposals are sensible and should be passed by Congress. But they won’t be. The left-right divide on climate in US politics is unnecessary.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/02/comment-23-february-2012-obama-tries-again-to-cut-fossil-fuel-subsidies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>16 January 2012: Investment in clean energy increases</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/01/comment-16-january-2012-investment-in-clean-energy-increases/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/01/comment-16-january-2012-investment-in-clean-energy-increases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global investment in renewables and energy efficiency increased 5% to $260 billion in 2011, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/01/comment-16-january-2012-investment-in-clean-energy-increases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 January 2012: Response from Philip Lowe on Energy Roadmap</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/01/response-from-philip-lowe-on-energy-roadmap/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/01/response-from-philip-lowe-on-energy-roadmap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Lowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['cap-and-trade']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philip Lowe, the Director General, Energy in the European Commission, has responded to my criticism of the EU's Energy Roadmap.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/01/response-from-philip-lowe-on-energy-roadmap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>27 December 2011: Commission’s energy roadmap is a missed opportunity</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/comment-27-december-2011-commission%e2%80%99s-energy-roadmap-is-a-missed-opportunity/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/comment-27-december-2011-commission%e2%80%99s-energy-roadmap-is-a-missed-opportunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['cap-and-trade']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission trading schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Commission should focus on proposing specific policies, rather than modelling different scenarios. It has done well with its energy efficiency proposal; now it should propose strengthening the ETS and setting a 2030 renewables target.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/comment-27-december-2011-commission%e2%80%99s-energy-roadmap-is-a-missed-opportunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>16 December 2011: Was Durban a significant step forward?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/16-december-2011-was-durban-a-significant-step-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/16-december-2011-was-durban-a-significant-step-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission trading schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Durban was better than Copenhagen and a bit better than Cancun. However, it was basically just an agreement to keep talking. Policy makers must not allow international negotiations to exclude progress on national and regional measures.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/16-december-2011-was-durban-a-significant-step-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

