<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>climateanswers.info &#187; CCS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateanswers.info/tag/ccs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateanswers.info</link>
	<description>What we can and should do to prevent dangerous climate change and also to make us more secure, richer and happier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>26 April 2012: Germany planning several new fossil fuel plants</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/25-april-2012-germany-planning-many-new-fossil-fuel-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/25-april-2012-germany-planning-many-new-fossil-fuel-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germany is planning several new coal and gas power stations - without CCS - to replace its nuclear stations. This is bad for the climate and also a waste of money.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/25-april-2012-germany-planning-many-new-fossil-fuel-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 April 2012: UK struggling with low-carbon bridge technologies</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/2-april-2012-uk-struggling-with-low-carbon-bridge-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/2-april-2012-uk-struggling-with-low-carbon-bridge-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK is running another competition on CCS. But practical progress so far has been precisely zero. And Eon and RWE have pulled out of their UK nuclear joint venture. So there's a real risk that the UK will experience another 'dash for gas' without CCS.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/2-april-2012-uk-struggling-with-low-carbon-bridge-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 November 2011: European Climate Foundation roadmap</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/11/8-november-european-climate-foundation-roadmap/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/11/8-november-european-climate-foundation-roadmap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decarbonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission trading schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment on the launch of the European Climate Foundation’s latest report, Power Perspectives 2030. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/11/8-november-european-climate-foundation-roadmap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 October 2011: Has Europe given up fighting climate change?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/10/7-october-2011-has-europe-given-up-on-fighting-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/10/7-october-2011-has-europe-given-up-on-fighting-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission trading schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EU has long prided itself on leading international efforts to control climate change. Today, the issue is nowhere near the top of the EU’s agenda, having been eclipsed by the economic downturn and the eurozone debt crisis. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/10/7-october-2011-has-europe-given-up-on-fighting-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 September 2011: Which is worse, gas or nuclear?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/09/15-september-2011-which-is-worse-gas-or-nuclear/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/09/15-september-2011-which-is-worse-gas-or-nuclear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decarbonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is gas sufficiently low-carbon to be an adequate bridge technology? No - it's emissions for every unit of electricity produced are over three times as high as emissions from nuclear power.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/09/15-september-2011-which-is-worse-gas-or-nuclear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>29 July 2011: Jonathon Porritt on nuclear power</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/29-july-2011-jonathon-porritt-on-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/29-july-2011-jonathon-porritt-on-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comments on Jonathon Porritt's arguments against nuclear power.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/29-july-2011-jonathon-porritt-on-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The UK&#8217;s Energy White Paper and Renewables Roadmap</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/the-uks-energy-white-paper-and-renewables-roadmap/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/the-uks-energy-white-paper-and-renewables-roadmap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repowering communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables obligation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repowering communities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/the-uks-energy-white-paper-and-renewables-roadmap/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/logo-200x53.gif" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="logo" /></a>This is a summary and analysis of UK's white paper on Electricity Market Reform and Renewables Roadmap, published this week.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/the-uks-energy-white-paper-and-renewables-roadmap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The EU budget: the Union risks having the wrong debate</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/04/the-eu-budget-the-union-risks-having-the-wrong-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/04/the-eu-budget-the-union-risks-having-the-wrong-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://climateanswers.info/2011/04/the-eu-budget-the-union-risks-having-the-wrong-debate/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/EU-map-200x171.gif" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="EU map" /></a>The EU should spend less money on agriculture and more on improving the econommies of poorer member-states and on climate protection.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/04/the-eu-budget-the-union-risks-having-the-wrong-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>28 March 2011: Merkel punished for opportunism</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/28-march-2011-merkel-punished-for-opportunism/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/28-march-2011-merkel-punished-for-opportunism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday’s election in the German region Baden-Württemberg, one of Germany’s richest regions, saw Angela Merkel’s CDU lose power after over half a century in office and there can be little doubt that the campaign was heavily influenced by the Japanese nuclear issue.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/28-march-2011-merkel-punished-for-opportunism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>24 March 2011: UK Budget – two and a half steps forward, one and a half back</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/24-march-2011-uk-budget-%e2%80%93-two-and-a-half-steps-forward-one-and-a-half-back/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/24-march-2011-uk-budget-%e2%80%93-two-and-a-half-steps-forward-one-and-a-half-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['cap-and-trade']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday’s UK Budget wasn’t that bad for climate protection, although it wasn’t nearly as good as it should have been. Announcements on energy and the promised Green Investment Bank were quite good, but those on transport were awful.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/24-march-2011-uk-budget-%e2%80%93-two-and-a-half-steps-forward-one-and-a-half-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

