<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>climateanswers.info &#187; deforestation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateanswers.info/tag/deforestation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateanswers.info</link>
	<description>What we can and should do to prevent dangerous climate change and also to make us more secure, richer and happier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>3 June 2010: So it is getting warmer</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2010/06/editorial-3-june-2010-so-it-is-getting-warmer/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2010/06/editorial-3-june-2010-so-it-is-getting-warmer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=3675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last winter was cold in Europe and North America, leading those who ‘question’ climate change to accuse people like me of alarmism. However, a single event or year means little in climate terms, and Europe and North America are not, despite what their inhabitants often think, the entire globe.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2010/06/editorial-3-june-2010-so-it-is-getting-warmer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>18 January 2010: Obama’s first year</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2010/01/editorial-18-january-2010-obamas-first-year/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2010/01/editorial-18-january-2010-obamas-first-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['cap-and-trade']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=3017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama has done more to control climate change than President Bush ever did. However, that is hardly setting the bar very high.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2010/01/editorial-18-january-2010-obamas-first-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21 December 2009: Was Copenhagen worth it?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/editorial-21-december-2009-was-copenhagen-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/editorial-21-december-2009-was-copenhagen-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean development mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, just. The Copenhagen Accord is vague and, having been negotiated by a small number of countries led by the US, China, India, Brazil and South Africa, was only “noted” by the Conference, not formally adopted. Some progress was made on finance and some on forest protection - though not nearly enough on either. None was made on targets.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/editorial-21-december-2009-was-copenhagen-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>17 December 2009: Focus on forests and finance</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/editorial-17-december-2009-focus-on-forests-and-finance/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/editorial-17-december-2009-focus-on-forests-and-finance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=2668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the last two days of the Copenhagen Summit, world leaders should focus less on targets and more on forest protection and finance. Deforestation accounts for almost a fifth of annual global greenhouse gas emissions, ruins the lives of those who live in them and destroys wildlife. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/editorial-17-december-2009-focus-on-forests-and-finance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offsetting: What is it and is it desirable?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/offsetting-what-is-it-and-is-it-desirable/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/offsetting-what-is-it-and-is-it-desirable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['cap-and-trade']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=2657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/offsetting-what-is-it-and-is-it-desirable/><img src=http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Offsetting3-150x150.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=130  border=0></a>Much has been talked about 'carbon offsetting' in recent years and it is now a well known expression.  But what is it and is it desirable?

Well, it is easy to define in three distinct ways, but whether it is a good idea depends on what is actually meant.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/offsetting-what-is-it-and-is-it-desirable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 October 2009: Acting locally, thinking globally</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/editorial-15-october-2009-acting-local-thinking-global/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/editorial-15-october-2009-acting-local-thinking-global/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Answers' projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=2107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Think global; act local” - the phrase often used by of Friends of the Earth - is an excellent philosophy. Since most of us do not have the power to influence international events, we should focus more on taking practical steps in our own localities. Climate change is the ultimate global issue and it does not matter where greenhouse gases are emitted. So global thinking is needed. However, practical measures are more important than yet more thought and discussion or international targets. Copenhagen is important, but must not be the only focus at the moment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/editorial-15-october-2009-acting-local-thinking-global/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 October 2009: Indonesian government bold on climate</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/editorial-1-october-2009-indonesian-government-bold-on-climate/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/editorial-1-october-2009-indonesian-government-bold-on-climate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=1902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was preparing the statistics page on Indonesia yesterday, when I heard the dreadful news about the two earthquakes in Sumatra. Earthquakes are not caused by climate change and, obviously, dealing with the consequences of these ones is currently more important than anything else. However, because the speech on Tuesday by President Yudhoyono, in which he announced plans to cut his country’s emissions by more than a quarter by 2020, was bold and progressive, it deserves to be highlighted.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/10/editorial-1-october-2009-indonesian-government-bold-on-climate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
