<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>climateanswers.info &#187; nuclear power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateanswers.info/tag/nuclear-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateanswers.info</link>
	<description>What we can and should do to prevent dangerous climate change and also to make us more secure, richer and happier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear energy, no thanks – we’ll do it ourselves</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/nuclear-energy-no-thanks-%e2%80%93-we%e2%80%99ll-do-it-ourselves/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/nuclear-energy-no-thanks-%e2%80%93-we%e2%80%99ll-do-it-ourselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prashant Vaze</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Repowering communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repowering communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/nuclear-energy-no-thanks-%e2%80%93-we%e2%80%99ll-do-it-ourselves/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Schonau4-150x150.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Schonau" /></a>Three months after the Fukashima nuclear reactor caught fire, Germany decided to phase out nuclear power. The decision stunned Europe’s energy policy community. Nuclear presently provides a quarter of Germany’s electricity - how would it plug the gap?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/nuclear-energy-no-thanks-%e2%80%93-we%e2%80%99ll-do-it-ourselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 November 2011: European Climate Foundation roadmap</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/11/8-november-european-climate-foundation-roadmap/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/11/8-november-european-climate-foundation-roadmap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decarbonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission trading schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment on the launch of the European Climate Foundation’s latest report, Power Perspectives 2030. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/11/8-november-european-climate-foundation-roadmap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 September 2011: Which is worse, gas or nuclear?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/09/15-september-2011-which-is-worse-gas-or-nuclear/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/09/15-september-2011-which-is-worse-gas-or-nuclear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decarbonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is gas sufficiently low-carbon to be an adequate bridge technology? No - it's emissions for every unit of electricity produced are over three times as high as emissions from nuclear power.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/09/15-september-2011-which-is-worse-gas-or-nuclear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 August 2011: Report of America&#8217;s nuclear commission is disappointing</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/08/1-august-2011-report-of-americas-nuclear-commission-disappointing/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/08/1-august-2011-report-of-americas-nuclear-commission-disappointing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s nuclear future, set up by President Obama, has now issued a draft report. It seeks to avoid the most controversial issues, and doesn't consider the most promising new nuclear technology - thorium molten salt reactors - so is disappointing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/08/1-august-2011-report-of-americas-nuclear-commission-disappointing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>29 July 2011: Jonathon Porritt on nuclear power</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/29-july-2011-jonathon-porritt-on-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/29-july-2011-jonathon-porritt-on-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comments on Jonathon Porritt's arguments against nuclear power.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/29-july-2011-jonathon-porritt-on-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thorium: How to save Europe’s nuclear revival</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/thorium-how-to-save-europe%e2%80%99s-nuclear-revival/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/thorium-how-to-save-europe%e2%80%99s-nuclear-revival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thorium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/thorium-how-to-save-europe%e2%80%99s-nuclear-revival/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/CER-LOGO1-200x62.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="CER LOGO" /></a>The Centre for European Reform (CER) has now published my short report on what the EU should do about nuclear power after the events at Fukushima.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/thorium-how-to-save-europe%e2%80%99s-nuclear-revival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 June 2011: Prospects for nuclear power after Fukushima</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/2-june-2011-prospects-for-nuclear-power-after-fukushima/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/2-june-2011-prospects-for-nuclear-power-after-fukushima/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New nuclear stations in the UK are far from certain. But even after Fukushima, they are not impossible.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/2-june-2011-prospects-for-nuclear-power-after-fukushima/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>28 March 2011: Merkel punished for opportunism</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/28-march-2011-merkel-punished-for-opportunism/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/28-march-2011-merkel-punished-for-opportunism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday’s election in the German region Baden-Württemberg, one of Germany’s richest regions, saw Angela Merkel’s CDU lose power after over half a century in office and there can be little doubt that the campaign was heavily influenced by the Japanese nuclear issue.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/28-march-2011-merkel-punished-for-opportunism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t we get to clean energy without using nuclear power?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/why-cant-we-get-to-clean-energy-without-using-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/why-cant-we-get-to-clean-energy-without-using-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers to your questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/why-cant-we-get-to-clean-energy-without-using-nuclear-power/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Question-mark-22.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Question mark #2" /></a>Why can't we get to clean energy without using nuclear power?

Russell Frerichs]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/why-cant-we-get-to-clean-energy-without-using-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>14 March 2011: The Japanese tsunami and nuclear power</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/14-march-2011-the-japanese-tsunami-and-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/14-march-2011-the-japanese-tsunami-and-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The horrific current events in Japan must make all who favour nuclear power question our support. I have spent much of the weekend doing so, but still believe that nuclear power is a necessary, low-carbon bridge-technology, until the world can be 100% reliant on renewables.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/03/14-march-2011-the-japanese-tsunami-and-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

