<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>climateanswers.info &#187; nuclear power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateanswers.info/tag/nuclear-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateanswers.info</link>
	<description>What we can and should do to prevent dangerous climate change and also to make us more secure, richer and happier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>26 April 2012: Germany planning several new fossil fuel plants</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/25-april-2012-germany-planning-many-new-fossil-fuel-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/25-april-2012-germany-planning-many-new-fossil-fuel-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germany is planning several new coal and gas power stations - without CCS - to replace its nuclear stations. This is bad for the climate and also a waste of money.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/25-april-2012-germany-planning-many-new-fossil-fuel-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 April 2012: UK struggling with low-carbon bridge technologies</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/2-april-2012-uk-struggling-with-low-carbon-bridge-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/2-april-2012-uk-struggling-with-low-carbon-bridge-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK is running another competition on CCS. But practical progress so far has been precisely zero. And Eon and RWE have pulled out of their UK nuclear joint venture. So there's a real risk that the UK will experience another 'dash for gas' without CCS.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/04/2-april-2012-uk-struggling-with-low-carbon-bridge-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 March 2012: A response to four former Friends of the Earth directors on nuclear power</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2012/03/15-march-2012-response-to-4-former-friends-of-the-earth-directors-on-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2012/03/15-march-2012-response-to-4-former-friends-of-the-earth-directors-on-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four former heads of Friends of the Earth wrote to prime minister, David Cameron, earlier this week, arguing against nuclear power. In response, five environmental authors - including me - have written to Cameron arguing in favour of new nuclear.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2012/03/15-march-2012-response-to-4-former-friends-of-the-earth-directors-on-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear energy, no thanks – we’ll do it ourselves</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/nuclear-energy-no-thanks-%e2%80%93-we%e2%80%99ll-do-it-ourselves/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/nuclear-energy-no-thanks-%e2%80%93-we%e2%80%99ll-do-it-ourselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Prashant Vaze</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Repowering communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repowering communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=5031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/nuclear-energy-no-thanks-%e2%80%93-we%e2%80%99ll-do-it-ourselves/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Schonau4-150x150.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Schonau" /></a>Three months after the Fukashima nuclear reactor caught fire, Germany decided to phase out nuclear power. The decision stunned Europe’s energy policy community. Nuclear presently provides a quarter of Germany’s electricity - how would it plug the gap?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/12/nuclear-energy-no-thanks-%e2%80%93-we%e2%80%99ll-do-it-ourselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 November 2011: European Climate Foundation roadmap</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/11/8-november-european-climate-foundation-roadmap/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/11/8-november-european-climate-foundation-roadmap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decarbonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission trading schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment on the launch of the European Climate Foundation’s latest report, Power Perspectives 2030. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/11/8-november-european-climate-foundation-roadmap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 September 2011: Which is worse, gas or nuclear?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/09/15-september-2011-which-is-worse-gas-or-nuclear/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/09/15-september-2011-which-is-worse-gas-or-nuclear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decarbonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is gas sufficiently low-carbon to be an adequate bridge technology? No - it's emissions for every unit of electricity produced are over three times as high as emissions from nuclear power.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/09/15-september-2011-which-is-worse-gas-or-nuclear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 August 2011: Report of America&#8217;s nuclear commission is disappointing</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/08/1-august-2011-report-of-americas-nuclear-commission-disappointing/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/08/1-august-2011-report-of-americas-nuclear-commission-disappointing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s nuclear future, set up by President Obama, has now issued a draft report. It seeks to avoid the most controversial issues, and doesn't consider the most promising new nuclear technology - thorium molten salt reactors - so is disappointing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/08/1-august-2011-report-of-americas-nuclear-commission-disappointing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>29 July 2011: Jonathon Porritt on nuclear power</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/29-july-2011-jonathon-porritt-on-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/29-july-2011-jonathon-porritt-on-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comments on Jonathon Porritt's arguments against nuclear power.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/07/29-july-2011-jonathon-porritt-on-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thorium: How to save Europe’s nuclear revival</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/thorium-how-to-save-europe%e2%80%99s-nuclear-revival/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/thorium-how-to-save-europe%e2%80%99s-nuclear-revival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thorium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/thorium-how-to-save-europe%e2%80%99s-nuclear-revival/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/CER-LOGO1-200x62.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="CER LOGO" /></a>The Centre for European Reform (CER) has now published my short report on what the EU should do about nuclear power after the events at Fukushima.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/thorium-how-to-save-europe%e2%80%99s-nuclear-revival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 June 2011: Prospects for nuclear power after Fukushima</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/2-june-2011-prospects-for-nuclear-power-after-fukushima/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/2-june-2011-prospects-for-nuclear-power-after-fukushima/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New nuclear stations in the UK are far from certain. But even after Fukushima, they are not impossible.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2011/06/2-june-2011-prospects-for-nuclear-power-after-fukushima/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

