<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>climateanswers.info &#187; clean development mechanism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateanswers.info/tag/clean-development-mechanism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateanswers.info</link>
	<description>What we can and should do to prevent dangerous climate change and also to make us more secure, richer and happier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>21 December 2009: Was Copenhagen worth it?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/editorial-21-december-2009-was-copenhagen-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/editorial-21-december-2009-was-copenhagen-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean development mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, just. The Copenhagen Accord is vague and, having been negotiated by a small number of countries led by the US, China, India, Brazil and South Africa, was only “noted” by the Conference, not formally adopted. Some progress was made on finance and some on forest protection - though not nearly enough on either. None was made on targets.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/12/editorial-21-december-2009-was-copenhagen-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>17 August 2009: Japan and green growth</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/08/editorial-17-june-2009-japan-and-green-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/08/editorial-17-june-2009-japan-and-green-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean development mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=1403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Japan seems to have come out of recession and its economy is, once again, growing. This is potentially bad news for the climate, but need not be.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/08/editorial-17-june-2009-japan-and-green-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

