<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>climateanswers.info &#187; nuclear fusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateanswers.info/tag/nuclear-fusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateanswers.info</link>
	<description>What we can and should do to prevent dangerous climate change and also to make us more secure, richer and happier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>31 July 2010: European Commission sensible on coal subsidies, but not on nuclear fusion</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2010/07/31-july-2010-european-commission-sensible-on-coal-subsidies-but-not-on-nuclear-fusion/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2010/07/31-july-2010-european-commission-sensible-on-coal-subsidies-but-not-on-nuclear-fusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tindale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear fusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=4069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Commission has done well in securing some – though not nearly enough - money to support renewables and CCS from the European economic recovery plan and from auctioning permits under the EU’s emissions trading scheme. By comparison, EU countries paid out €3 billion in national coal subsidies in 2008 alone. All OECD countries together give $400 billion every year in subsidies to fossil fuels, compared with $45 billion to nuclear and $27 billion to renewables, according to the International Energy Agency.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2010/07/31-july-2010-european-commission-sensible-on-coal-subsidies-but-not-on-nuclear-fusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question: What about nuclear fusion?</title>
		<link>http://climateanswers.info/2009/06/question-what-about-nuclear-fusion/</link>
		<comments>http://climateanswers.info/2009/06/question-what-about-nuclear-fusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers to your questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear fusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateanswers.info/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://climateanswers.info/2009/06/question-what-about-nuclear-fusion/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://climateanswers.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Question-mark-2.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Question mark #2" title="Question mark #2" /></a>Apart from CCS, there is much good sense on all sides of the debate on measures to reduce carbon emissions. Why haven't you mentioned the ultimate medium term opportunity - nuclear fusion?

Leighton Upton]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climateanswers.info/2009/06/question-what-about-nuclear-fusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

