1 November 2011: No Dieter, it’s not ‘the wonder gas’
Posted in Comment on 11/01/2011 11:01 am byComment by Robert Webb on Dieter Helm’s claim that gas is a cheaper way to cut carbon emissions than renewables.
read more »Comment by Robert Webb on Dieter Helm’s claim that gas is a cheaper way to cut carbon emissions than renewables.
read more »On Tuesday evening I went to an anti-fracking meeting in Preston, Lancashire. I support fracking, but I also support evidence-based campaigning (seehttp://climateanswers.info/2015/09/25-september-2015-we-need-evidence-based-campaigning/) and try to listen to different sides of the argument. And views in different parts of the country are often very different, so I need to get out of London to hear them. […]
read more »My article for Interfax Global Energy on why shale gas is part of the way forward for climate and energy policy.
read more »My response to Tony Bosworth’s comments on my shale gas blog
read more »Last week the Sun published an article by me on shale gas https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1997618/as-a-lifelong-green-im-convinced-frackings-the-only-solution-to-energy-problems/. The journalist I worked with on the text was excellent, and I had full editorial control. In the article I say that shale gas is part of the answer. The headline writer then wrote that I think it is “the only solution”. I don’t. […]
read more »Evidence-based campaigning is very desirable, and in sadly short supply. Green groups should follow the evidence that the worst source of energy is coal. Campaign against coal, not against shale gas.
read more »The EU summit on 4 February, billed as an Energy Summit, said little new or unexpected. The forthcoming Energy Efficiency Action Plan must be much more ambitious.
read more »Consultancy Remsol has today published a constructive Blueprint for shale gas community benefits. (http://www.remsol.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Remsol-A-Blueprint-for-Shale-Gas-Community-Benefits-09082016.pdf ). I wrote the foreword: “UK shale gas production could and should be part of a low-carbon transition, enabling Britain to phase out coal more quickly while strengthening energy security. Domestically-extracted shale gas would be less climate-damaging than coal, but also than […]
read more »Climate campaigners should be more pragmatic and more prepared to make compromises. Pragmatism often delivers progress; idealism rarely does.
read more »What about boring old natural gas? I can’t find any mention of it anywhere on your site and I wonder how much you or your readers know about the recent revolution in unconventional “shale” gas which has meant some geologists think that there is nine times more natural gas available on a planetary scale than thought as little as two or three years ago.
Nick Grealy
read more »Progressive campaigners should support fracking for shale gas, which would enable the UK to reduce the burning of coal and the import of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). We could also then stop buying gas from regimes which abuse human rights.
read more »